Awaiting reviewer assignment after under review. I didnt see the "under review .

Awaiting reviewer assignment after under review In the first notification, I got a major revision. Peer review is an honorary service that requires detailed The manuscript being stuck at Awaiting Reviewer Assignment for a month is not uncommon. After a few days, the status changed to "Awaiting Review Scores". Awaiting Editor Decision. After the ADM had been assigned, I remember seeing "reviewer assignment" and "reviewer selection". My personal guideline was to invite new reviewers if the previous reviewer had gone seven days without answering the invitation. Awaiting Editor Assignment: While this typically means that the manuscript is awaiting assignment to an AE, in this case, it probably means it is awaiting assignment to a peer reviewer. The minimum would be either two or three depending on the Once the requisite number of reviewers (generally 2 to 3) accept the invitation, the status changes to "Awaiting reviewer scores" which is the equivalent of "Under review. Ditolak 2. ’ But this could be because the "Awaiting Reviewer Scores" means that the paper has been assigned the minimum amount of reviewers that the Associate Editor has set for the manuscript. For the first week of submission, the status was "with editor" and then it changed to under review for one week, then reviewers asigned I submitted a paper of mine to an Emerald journal. I assume Awaiting Reviewer Assignment means the journal editor has started reaching out to potential reviewers for your manuscript. 40 days later, I received a decision letter suggesting minor revision, after which I made the suggested changes and submitted again. Diterima dengan After a week of submission, the status changed to "awaiting reviewer selections". Now, it has changed to ‘Assigning for The status “reviewers assigned” indicates that the reviewers accepted the invitation to review your paper. Awaiting Reviewer Assignment: Please access our published paper in TAR using the DOI Under review: When at least one reviewer agrees to review (status change from reviewer assigned to Under review). The first status read "Awaiting Admin Processing", then 2 days later it read "Pre-Review Stage". " This status has not been changed for a month. Share makalah pada sistem, ditandai dengan Awaiting Assignment pada Status. " Then it changed to "Awaiting reviewer assignment" What does it mean? Will my paper be reviewed again? If accepted, the paper is sent to production. ’ One week later, it was ‘Under review. or does the editor might assign new reviewers to evaluate I submitted a paper to a journal that uses the ScholarOne submission system. The author does not know the identity of the reviewers, but the reviewers know the identity of the author. The reason with it is now Editor Assigned can be due to several reasons. But only after two days As an editor, I can tell you getting a reviewer let alone a competent reviewer is difficult. This change has occurred Also known as: with reviewers, with referees, under review, awaiting referee assignment, awaiting referee reports, awaiting reviewer scores, awaiting reviewer invitation , reviewers assigned, manuscript assigned to peer-reviewer/s (NPG) I submitted a paper to a journal of Emerald Publishing. 3. Later, it has been under "Awaiting review scores" for the past 25 days. I find "awaiting reviewer invitation" to be a slightly strange phrase, but taken at face value it seems to mean that they still have not even asked anyone to referee the paper, let alone found a referee, let alone gotten the report back from a referee! For instance, if ‘Awaiting Final Decision’ happened earlier, it may mean the AE first decided to refer their decision to the EIC, but changed their mind, and then decided to send it for review. The status changed from "Awaiting Reviewer Reply" to "Awaiting Reviewer Scores", then stayed like that for a Most likely the assigned reviewer agreed to review but then didn't provide a review, declined to review, or provided a review that made the editor think another review is required. As a result of this, you may receive a further round of The peer review status may initially transition from ‘Submitted’ to ‘Under Review’ once the manuscript is assigned to peer reviewers. The Hello, I have experienced a manuscript tracking that is a little odd. In this case, you will notice that the duration of Under Review is relatively short for 1-2 weeks. The status is shown as “awaiting reviewer selection” apparently because the editor is still waiting for reviewers to accept the invitation to review. The manuscript status has changed from "awaiting reviewer scores" back to "under review". I received provisional acceptance with minor revisions. I submitted a manuscript to a Springer journal. On the occasion that a reviewer withdraws from the process, the Editorial Team will begin the reviewer selection process again. The Action Editor may decide to make a decision without allocating reviewers. Then, it was updated to ‘Reviewers Assigned’ in about two weeks. What does this 'Under Review' status mean? Peer Review in Progress. Decision notification e-mails and what they mean. Reviewers have been invited and the peer review process is underway. So I thought it passed the associate editor's evaluation and now they were looking for reviewers. Peer review is an honorary service that requires detailed scrutiny and evaluation of the manuscript and therefore takes time. This depends a lot on the manuscript management system, and the editorial practices. In the month of December, I got a "reject and resubmit" decision. Eventually, an editor will make a decision and you will get your paper back with comments from peer reviewers. Why does the status change back to "Reviewers assigned" after 3 days of "Under review"? A practical handbook of templates for communicating with the journal; All the best for the next UgkR4R‡ ÀÕ=$¢²×ÃN °9iõ¨Z$d^°úãן þûO Á¸û ´lÇåöx}~_¾ÍúïäçËÑ« {ñ¹ Œg^BÈÍ È1¤R²Ý6 Yr$ ›0üo~³ÿ “ÑŽéÆU »J’ý After a month, I received major reviews, made the necessary revisions, and resubmitted the manuscript. " If the status changed to "under review" directly after submission without showing any other status before it, your paper was probably under the internal admin check and not external peer review. After I submitted the revision, the status became "awaiting reviewer selection. I submitted a manuscript to a reputed journal using the ScholarOne system. Awaiting Reviewer Selection, which is the next stage, means that the editor has received After making revisions according to the reviewers' comments, I submitted the revised manuscript a few days ago. Now, it's in the "Awaiting EIC Decision" for more than one month. The reviewers usually take 1-2 months to review a submission, but some papers may take longer, e. Under Review. The paper stayed in the "Awaiting Reviewer Selection" stage for around three months. According to the publishing office, they can’t find a reviewer. ’ (Note that ‘r’ was not capitalized. This status means that the manuscript is under peer review. After agreeing to review a manuscript, external reviewers are typically granted 28 days to I have experienced a confusing situation. However, after a few days, I got a desk reject notification. Once your manuscript passes the initial quality check, we assign it to a member of Editorial Board, who is an active researcher in your field. The status of the paper changed several times. such as "Awaiting Reviewer A major revision was submitted to a journal. But today suddenly the status changed back to Understand the journal and case study peer review process and read our tips for revising your submission. This change Explore the transition in manuscript status from 'Under Review' to 'Reviewers Assigned. This caused the system to stuck in "Awaiting reviewer Assignment". Best guess: reviews came in after all this time but were inconclusive, and "editor assigned" is the default state when needing to get more reviews and no reviewer has actually been assigned. At this point, reviewers should also be sent an email or letter letting them know the outcome of their review. After the ADM had been assigned, I remember seeing "reviewer assignment" and "reviewer I have submitted my paper to one of the springer journal. The second status update 'AE assigned, under review' was probably used to indicate the After being under the status 'All reviewers assigned', the manuscript status changed back to 'Manuscript Under consideration'. What does this mean? Will it go for review? I just submitted a revised paper to ScholarOne (major revision). Status as "Under Review": Reviewers have been invited and the peer review process is underway The AE assigns the paper to three reviewers, usually within 7 days after the paper has been assigned to the AE. I revised the paper accordingly and addressed the feedbacks. Does it mean that the original reviewers are now not accessible anymore? Last December, I submitted my paper to a Springer Nature journal. However, the status has been "awaiting reviewer selection" for the last 3 weeks. Following this, it may shift to ‘Required Review Completed’ when the editor receives feedback from all assigned reviewers. But all of a sudden, instead of moving to "Under Review If the editorial management system (EMS) is distinguishing between the two, odds are "Awaiting Reviewer Selection" means the reviewers have not been invited yet, and "Awaiting Reviewer Confirmation" means the reviewers have not agreed to review the manuscript yet. Today it went It’s quite common for editors to select a lot of reviewers, but only invite a few at a time. Now, it shows Awaiting Decision. I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again Does "Under Review" mean that the paper has passed the editorial check? The status “awaiting final decision after awaiting reviewer scores” means that the peer review has been completed and the reviewer comments have been sent back to the editorial office for assessment. Decisions on JFM Papers and JFM Rapids submitted to Journal of Fluid Mechanics are made by the Associate Editors. I suppose that in most cases of minor revision, the revised manuscript will only be reviewed by the ADM or associate editor. I took this to mean that the paper has passed the desk review, since the editor is selecting reviewers. However, today, My paper has been submitted for more than 15 months in one of the IEEE transactions. I submitted a manuscript to a Sage Journal almost 50 days ago. Note that an Edit link appears here only if you have permission to adjust the settings. After that, it changed to 'Under Review. After the editorial review, the reviewers were invited, and the status changed to 'Reviewers Assigned. Once the required number of reviewers accept the review invitation, the status changes to "Under review. For the first week of submission, the status was "with editor" and then it changed to under review for one week, then reviewers asigned After almost three weeks of "Awaiting reviewer assignment" status, it changes to "Reviewers contacted". This change has occurred This status will remain until an Editor takes an action in the system to change the status, usually inviting reviewers. What does this mean? Was the manuscript reviewed? I think the status should have changed to something like Awaiting Reviewer Scores before Awaiting EIC Decision. Interestingly, it is/was awaiting "reviewer" (not reviewers- in a plural I submitted my manuscript to Management Science. I think the first status update 'AE not assigned, under review' was used to refer to the initial admin check that is done by editorial assistants before the paper is sent for review. After the review scores come back, a manuscript then So, why the sudden shift from 'under review' to 'reviewers assigned'? This change typically occurs when one of the original reviewers declines to review your manuscript, after accepting the invitation. Then, the other reviewers submitted their reviews and the Editor decided to go with these reviews only. A month later (on May 1), it changed to 'Reviewers Assigned' again, and is still the same status. Could you please tell me what is the meaning of under review and Editor assignment pending after "review competed" Ask Question Asked 9 years, 6 months ago. (These details aren’t provided in your query. I know the next stage is to Editor In chief. I submitted an article to a ScholarOne journal. On July 12 the status was Awaiting AE Assignment Awaiting EIC Decision Does it mean rejection? the manuscript will be forwarded to the reviewers. Is switching a reviewer after minor revision common? If so, would new comments be added by a new reviewer that were not included in the first review? The status "Reviewer assignment pending" clearly indicates that your paper has not yet been sent for peer review. However, the status changed to ‘Assigning for review’ for about a week and then changed to ‘Under review’ again, this time for about a week. I was thrilled because I thought that might mean I'll get an answer the reason for my question is to understand what are the circumstances that make the editor change the status from completed to assigned. then the EIC would be the one to evaluate the manuscript. ’ For example, (i) Manuscript Submitted may be same with Undergoing Initial Checking, (ii) Reviewers Invited may be same with Reviewers Assigned, (iii) Under Review may be same with Awaiting Reviewer Scores, Awaiting Referee Scores, and Manuscript Assigned to Peer-Reviewer/s (iv) Required Reviews Completed is same with Reviews Completed, and (v Even when the editor was not assigned, the term 'under review' was used. Because ‘Awaiting Reviewer Selection’ means that the manuscript passed the admin and/or Associate Editor (AE) check and was awaiting peer review. The current status of the manuscript is ‘Awaiting Reviewer Assignment’ and has not changed for a month now. but a likely meaning is that the paper has been handed off from the associate editor who has been Awaiting Reviewer Scores means that your paper is being peer reviewed. This change has occurred Reviewer Assignment:The status "awaiting reviewer assignment" indicates that the editorial team is in the process of selecting and assigning new reviewers to evaluate your revised manuscript With a typical ScholarOne configuration, "Awaiting Reviewer Scores" means that it is actually out with (at least some) reviewers, while "Under Review" would instead mean the previous stage, where it is being considered by the handling editor(s) and might still be rejected without review. Sometimes, a reviewer may pull out after being assigned, for reasons of a lack of time, mismatch (with their subject area), or conflict of interest. And then the status automatically changed to "under review". A direct change after submission (or after the initial admin check) to ‘Awaiting AE Recommendation’ typically means that the Associate Editor (AE) has had a look at the paper and decided not to send it for review. Awaiting EIC decision must have appeared after the first status while you did not check your status! It Appearing after short interval of awaiting reviewer assignment clearly means that associate editors have advised against it! Now the EIC has to make decision. " However, in your case, the status changed back After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. A date for receipt of manuscript proofs I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again The status changed to admin check to under review after one week. Your article That could be because the system requires four reviewers, but the editor has only gotten the commitment from three people to review the paper. Scenario 2: awaiting reviewer selection>> under review If this was the way the status had changed, then it is possible that the online status tracking software uses the status "awaiting reviewer selection" to indicate that the paper is with the editor. When the status changes to "Under Review", the manuscript is with reviewers Note that the review process at BLC is single-anonymous. , when they are especially complex or are received during the review The editors are reading it and checking their reviewer list. I assumed that this status meant that my manuscript was finally sent to reviewers and was being under review by them. It means that the AE has performed their initial check (as described in the previous point) and is looking for suitable peer reviewers. Mar 16, 2022 · Answer: Dear Author, Thank you for your question. After a while, yesterday the status changed to "Awaiting AE Recommendation". A few days ago, it was changed to "awaiting reviewer selection". It is against TMI policy to reveal the status of a paper under review. Now for the last Hi. After one day of submission, status was ‘Awaiting Decision’; but now after 10 days, status change into ‘Awaiting reviewer selection’. Is it possible to get a desk reject after the "awaiting reviewer selection" stage? This status "With Associate Editor" means that the associate editor who is in charge of your manuscript has received the minimum number of reviews (usually 2) for your paper. Awaiting Reviewer Invitation: The reviewers have been selected and are awaiting acceptance to review Awaiting Reviewer Assignment: A number of reviewers have accepted to review, but the number is I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again When a paper is assigned to a reviewer, the reviewer may decline or fail to review the paper. What does this mean? Please help. Peer review The Editor decides whether reviews from additional experts are needed to evaluate the manuscript. Then after a week or so, it changed to "Awaiting Reviewer Score(s)" and same day it changed back to "Under Review". Usually, an article being assigened to an editor after review is a good thing. So, keep Since then it has been 4 months and the paper is still 'awaiting reviewer invitation'. However, this change should not be cause for has not yet been sent to reviewers (however, the Editor may have assigned the manuscript to an Associate Editor – there is no separate system status to indicate this). Peer review scores have been sent to the editor and the status is awaiting editor decision for almost 4 weeks now. Required reviews completed: Minimum number of reviews has been received. After submitting the revised article for a week, a ADM was assigned and the status has changed to "awaiting reviewer invitation. Since your manuscript required major revisions, it will have to be checked by the reviewers again after resubmission. Is it a bad sign? After submission, the status first indicated that the editor has been assigned. Now in February, 2022, I resumitted the manuscript. This means that while the manuscript cleared the desk screening and was deemed good to go for peer review, the journal is finding it I submitted a paper to an internationally reputed journal. 5. Ketika proses review selesai Anda akan mendapatkan email pemberitahuan. So, one can’t really put a timeline to it. Then a few days later it switched back to "Awaiting referee assignment" again. Then in 3 weeks it was "awaiting reviewer reports" and yesterday finally "awaiting editorial decision". ) Jan 18, 2020 · A status change from AE Assigned to AE Review means that the manuscript has been picked up by the AE for review. However, I definitely remember the last two: from "awaiting reviewer recommendations" to "awaiting final decision". ” However, reviewer selection happens much faster in case of revised Hi everyone, I am a bit confused and wanted to bug you about something. The AE should invite reviewers in a timely manner (within 5 working days) after receiving the assignment of the manuscript by the Editor-in-Chief. Status akan berubah menjadi In Review dalam beberapa waktu ketika proses review mulai dilakukan. Thus, seemingly, the review process ended only for a second one to be initiated by the EA just days later. Share. 10 weeks) however, when we invite the reviewer we gave them 1 week to accept reviewing task and 4 weeks to submit reviewing reports. Under review: The paper is with reviewers for comment or waiting for the Action Editor’s decision. These both relate to having a current cv uploaded online on your department's or your personal website. ' Is it under review again or has the editor not seen my paper? Could you please clarify?. ' If the status of the manuscript is shown as "With Editor", the manuscript is either awaiting in- house evaluation or is awaiting the assignment of reviewers. Required Reviews - #: when this number of reviews are complete, the status changes to 'Required Reviews Complete' Uninvite After - # I submitted manuscript in October, 2021. I submitted a paper to a Springer journal about 2 months ago. I thought this meant the external review. What does this mean? If all the reviewers accept the invitations, the peer review process will start and the status will change to "Under review. But after three days of this change, suddenly, the status changed back to ‘Awaiting Referee Assignment. If the reviewers are slow and the journal doesn't have a policy mandating reviewers to submit the It sounded like their "under review" meant basically "Under Editor's Review". Modified 9 years, I would complain if my paper is still not under review after one month, but it’s fine if it is under review at that time. " Does it mean that my paper will go through another round of review with new reviewers? I was told that for paper with "minor revision," it is likely like it will not be sent back to the reviewers. After submitting the revision it goes through (awaiting for reviewer selection -> awaiting for reviewer scores -> awaiting for editors decision -> Awaiting EIC Decision). Reviewers contacted --> the editors are trying to find reviewers; Under review --> some journals seem to use this for every stage of peer review. What does this brief "Under review" means? Why dit Those possibilities though are usually in the early days after submission. Role of the journal editor. How should this double status be interpreted? Is the revised manuscript with However, in this case, “Under Review” means that the paper was picked up for an initial review of the quality of the paper and of a match with the journal’s scope. I have submitted a paper in a journal's special issue. This does not mean that he has received all the reviews he is expecting, some reviewers are invited or accept their invitations later than others (sometimes 2-3 weeks apart, even longer), or maybe My paper underwent a revision. I submited my paper to The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal. After revision and resubmision, my manuscript status was "Awaiting AE recommendation. Peer review times vary per I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again I recently submitted my first paper to a philosophy journal. This April, we received the reviewer's response and resubmitted after correction on May 18. I don't know what this means and why it is taking so long. ) What does this imply? Then, another week later, it turned to ‘Assigning for Review. Awaiting Editor Decision I have submitted my paper to one of the springer journal. I for example look at my assignments once a week. ’ At first, the status showed "awaiting AE recommendation". But, after that, the status changed to "Under review" for three days, and then it changed to "Reviewers assigned" again. As you may know, peer review can take a while, as peer reviewers do this along with their other work. While the Editor is assigned to a manuscript, authors may see the status “Awaiting EIC Assignment”. Your article has secured the minimum number of required reviewers. If the article is rejected or sent back for either major or minor revision, the handling editor should include constructive comments from the reviewers to help the author improve the article. As you submitted your manuscript in January, and it’s been four months since then, perhaps your manuscript went through a peer review and perhaps you also needed to make a minor or major revision and then resubmit. ’ However, 14 days later, it changed to ‘Reviewers Invited. So, now it's in the normal process of the Editor assessing the reviews. The first time I contacted was when a whole year was passed without even a single response. And from the past few days, I see it as "Awaiting AE recommendation". I submitted my manuscript to a journal. Thus the subsequent status “under review” means that the manuscript has been sent The first mission of the editor is to assign reviewers and take a decision depending on their return. For example, journals can configure status changes that give authors transparency into various stages within the review process that the submission will move through. “Awaiting SE Recommendation” means that it went to a Section Editor (SE) of the journal for checking the match with that section of the journal. Initially the status was "awaiting admin checklist", and then changed to I submitted a research paper to a journal. This change has occurred For example, (i) Manuscript Submitted may be same with Undergoing Initial Checking, (ii) Reviewers Invited may be same with Reviewers Assigned, (iii) Under Review may be same with Awaiting Reviewer Scores, If the previous editorial decision was C (revise & re-review) or D (major revisions & re-review), the paper will be sent for re-review to the original reviewers, together with your responses. Even yesterday the status was still "awaiting reviewer selection", but today it was changed to "awaiting EIC decision". t backed up) @scaaahu My only guess is that the Editor invited some reviewers, not all of which accepted. Do I just keep waiting, send another email? What should I do with this frustrating What does awaiting reviewer assignment mean under review? Awaiting Reviewer Assignment means the journal editor has started reaching out to potential reviewers for your manuscript. The status "Editor Assigned" typically indicates that an Associate • Assign Reviewers: Manuscripts awaiting responses from invited reviewers. g. But my question is as below 2022/11/4 Status: Under review 2023/2/12 Status: Major Revision 2023/3/27 Major revision submission, Status: Awaiting Reviewer Invitation It has been a month since submission, and it has been "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" all along. I'm a bit surprised that it jumped from pre-review straight to awaiting recommendation, without going "Under Review". The manuscript status was updated to ‘Under Review’ in a month after submission. For instance, it’s not clear if the initial status was ‘Awaiting Reviewer Selection’ or whether there was some other status prior to that. After some days, the status changed to 'awaiting reviewer scores', but there is also the status 'awaiting decision' right next to it. Then one day it was awaiting reviewer assignment, and then after a couple of days it went back to awaiting reviewer selection. Awaiting Reviewer Assignment. The online tracking system status was as follows: 17 Apr: New submission 18 Apr: Editor assigned 08 May: Under review 27 May: Reviews completed 29 May: Under review 06 Jun: Under review 25 Jun: Reviewers assigned. After one week, the status changed to 'Reviewers Assigned,' and it remained so for one day. It is an inadequate explanation for why your My manuscript submission status in ManuscriptCentral changed from ‘Awaiting Referee Assignment’ to ‘Under Review’ after 15 days of submission. It said awaiting reviewer selection for 3 weeks. In ScholarOne this would be like having it set to require 2 reviews, then when the 2 reviews come in, Dear Team, First, thank you for running such a stunning forum. In case ‘Awaiting Reviewer Selection’ happened earlier, they initially decided to send it for review, but changed their mind, and decided to Answer: Hello, After the review process, editor is assigned to check the quality of the paper and the reviewers comments. In this stage, the editor identifies a few reviewers for your paper and sends out email invitations to them. Awaiting Reviewer Selection, which is the next stage, means that the editor has received responses from multiple peer reviewers and is presently in the process of You have not mentioned whether there were any other statuses before "Under review. However, a strange observation is that I have resubmitted a paper which was revised which needed minor revisions, but the status remains “Awaiting Reviewer Assignment” for 5 weeks. Two days later, it changed to ‘Assigning for review. There are several decisions that authors may receive after submitting their paper to one of the Society's journals: Reject wit While this typically means that the manuscript is awaiting peer review, because the status changed so quickly after submission, this probably refers to the internal review, which is about aspects such as a match with the journal’s scope, the quality of the writing/presentation, and the research at a basic level. This is a placeholder queue that does not require check these manuscripts periodically • Awaiting Reviewer Scores: Manuscripts where reviewers have agreed to review, but have not submitted their review Overdue Reviewer Scores: Manuscripts where an agreed reviewer did Awaiting reviewer assignment under review CN Integrity Webinar March 31 SA Shelby See, this is just unhelpful. However, I just noticed that the status of my "Reviewers assigned" is where I have accepted to review a manuscript but not yet opened it and "Under review" is only after I have downloaded it. After 20 days, status has changed from "awaiting reviewer selection" to "awaiting reviewer assignment" and after 4 days, it has changed to "awaiting reviewer scores". I submitted a manuscript that went through the entire peer review process. After a couple of days, the status changed from "Awaiting AE assignment" to "Under Review". ’ It's been one month since this change happened and there is no update. An initial assessment will be performed, and the Associate Editor may reject without After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. If you didn't see "under review", then the editor is making a decision without consulting reviewers, which is usually a bad sign. I submitted my manuscript via ScholarOne and within 2 days my status went from "editor assigned" to "under review". Reviewers are not aware of the author’s identity, and you will not know the identity of the reviewers. I didnt see the "under review After submitting the revised article for a week, a ADM was assigned and the status has changed to "awaiting reviewer invitation. The paper was accepted with minor revision (two reviewers both recommended 'minor revision'). This rather ambiguous stage is when reviewers have been invited, but we are waiting for the required number to agree to review. After [I resubmitted for] a major revision (which took two months), the status was Awaiting Referee Scores. And, if they feel it lacks novelty or is not appropriate to be published in the journal, they give their decision against it. ’ Just a few hours later, another ADM was assigned, but the status is the same. After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. Reviewer assigned means the review process commenced. I submitted a manuscript to a medical science journal. After about a month, the status switched from "Awaiting Reviewer Scores" to "Awaiting recommendation". Related reading: What does a change from "awaiting editorial decision" back to "under review" mean? I submitted a manuscript to a journal about a week ago (via ScholarOne). What does this change mean? Does it mean that one of the selected reviewers has declined the invitation? Is it a bad sign? Review complete: This is the largest variance part because some reviewers agree to review but don’t actually submit one, some reviewers decline, some reviewers never respond to the invitation, and so on. However, this is not the end of the story. " 6. Once the journal sends reviewer invitations and the reviewers accept them, peer review will start and the status will change to "Under review. Coming to your present query, as we just indicated, this has been a slow change from ‘Awaiting Reviewer Assignment’ to ‘Under Review. In such instances, the editor seeks an alternative reviewer to ensure a comprehensive evaluation. This means they only check whether a paper has sufficient reviewers every K month(s). The status of the paper was 'Submitted. The EiC at that time said they'll look Thus it is very natural for a manuscript to be “awaiting peer review” or remain “under review” for several months, depending upon the field and the journal to which the manuscript is submitted. We define reviewing the timeline in author guidelines (e. Even a single reviewer didn’t accept the assignment, it starts showing overdue just after one week, although few reviewers accepted and under review. Immediately after submission, one ADM was assigned, but MAL ADM (an abbreviation that is not known to me) was not assigned, and the status was ‘Under review. My manuscript submission status in manuscriptcentral changed from ‘Awaiting Reviewer Assignment’ to ‘under review’ last three days ago. Last week I sent a gentle reminder to the editor and got no response. The reviewers write detailed technical reviews of the paper. ' On May 21, our paper's status changed to 'Editorial assignment pending. After one day the status was EA assignment pending and after two more days it was under review. Stage 2: Editor assigned. The status was ‘Assigning to editors’ for three days and then ‘Under review’ for a month. Last week, the status changed to Awaiting AE Recommendation. (Which the editor may deem enough, and so the status will never change until the three reviews have been received. " However, if one or more reviewers decline the invitation (because they have a conflict of What is meant by awaiting reviewer selection after being under review in scholar one online submission system? changed from "under review" to "awaiting reviewer assignment"? then changed In my opinion, this is probably what has happened to your paper, which is why the status has changed to "Awaiting reviewer invitation. ' However, after 15 days, it again changed to 'Reviewers Assigned. By November it showed awaiting EIC decision. I know some editors do it once a month or every K months. This change has occurred We oversee this process to ensure that your manuscript contains everything our editors and peer reviewers need to perform a fair and thorough assessment of your work. Therefore, new reviewers are being invited. This is more confusing as generally, 'Manuscript Under consideration' means that the editor is considering the manuscript for peer review. The paper status is still "awaiting reviewer assignment". From your query, it seems reviewers have been assigned for your manuscript. It’s only when the status changes to ‘Under Review,’ as you have rightly understood, that the actual review begins. Although in my earlier submission of other papers in the same journal, in this time frame, my paper went into review process. In other words, at this point, the ball is squarely in the reviewers’ court! AE stands for "Associate Editor. After peer review, the editor will consider feedback from the reviewers and then make a decision about the article. I had submitted a manuscript to a Q2 medicine journal via ScholarOne’s Manuscript Central. Further, an editor may not carry out his/her duties every day. The Invite Reviewers Menu is found on the left side of the Reviewer Selection Summary Page and is divided into sections:. Now the handling editor assigned to your manuscript will go Does it happen that the editor asks the reviewers to re-review a paper? For about 10 days or so it has been "awaiting final decision" after a few months of under review and then awaiting reviewers scores. If it has been "under review" for some time, then yes - the external reviewers are done. " Once the reviewer accepts the invitation, the status will change to "Under review" once again. As of today, it says "Awaiting Recommendation". This status typically means your manuscript is awaiting assignment to an editor after the initial review of the submission. After half a day, the status changed to ‘Under Review. The decision letter is delivered to the author via email. 1 Accept. Peer reviewers are given 2 weeks to submit their review of your article. Terdapat empat keputusan yang akan diperoleh setelah proses review terjadi: 1. Then, it turned to ‘Under review,’ which I thought was the internal review. ""Awaiting AE recommendation" status means that the AE has collected all reviews from the reviewers who were assigned to review your manuscript and that the AE's decision for acceptance is pending. I Journal of Fluid Mechanics uses a single-anonymous model of peer review. There is no need for anonymising the manuscript upon (1) Some journals carry an internal review firstly before sending the manuscript for external review. Reviewers are selected on the basis of expertise, prior publications in the same topic area, and prior performance as a reviewer (including quality and timeliness). After 40 days of the status being Awaiting Reviewer Selection, it changed to Awaiting EIC Decision. " However, if one or more reviewers decline the review invitation, the editor has to look for other reviewers. Then, there was a call for reviewers, and the status changed to ‘Reviewers Invited. Does that mean one of the reviewer reject the paper after major revision or he excused that he couldn't revise it and if that yes how can the reviewing completed then. ) I think @ShakeBaby might have nailed it in the "whatever" comment. ' After two days (on April 10), the status changed to 'Under Review'. Awaiting reviewer scores --> self One reason a paper can go from Editor Assigned to Editor Invited is if an associate editor has made a recommendation and has passed it onto the chief editor for a I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again their own expertise, or assign reviewers. After the editoral review, the reviewers were invited, and then the status changed to "Reviewers assigned" for two months. Once the adequate number of reviewers have accepted the invitation, the status should change to “under review. I have contacted the editor in chief (EiC) a few times regarding this. Does it mean the manuscript is already under review? Hopefully, good luck! Keep updating! Hello, I submitted my paper to one of the high impact factor journals month ago. I submitted a paper on April 8. In fact, this also probably means that the reviewer invitations have not been sent out yet. When the reviewers accept to review your manuscript, the status will change to under review. ' Now, after three weeks, the status date of the manuscript has changed, but the status remains 'Reviewers Assigned. Edit: got the email, they’ve sent invitations out to reviewers! Thanks for the nice responses and I’ll leave the post up for anxious status update checkers in the future :) Share Add a Comment. So, we have made some edits/assumptions. Also, one reviewer may send their comments on time or earlier, and the other(s) may take a while to get back. If the paper was sent back for revision, the You will see little messages like ‘awaiting editorial approval’, ‘awaiting reviewer scores’, ‘awaiting editorial board comments’ and ‘decision pending’ as your article wends its way through this process. Some examples include “editor assigned,” “reviewers invited,” “under review,” “review complete,” “decision pending,” and others. For the first 10 days, it was reviewed by the managing editor and sent to us for some format issues, etc. Hence the first Editor Assigned to Under Review. Review Settings . There are several factors that influence the time taken for review, most notably availability of article referees. Sort by: The under review date changed after 25 days Hello. No matter which decision you receive, be sure to read the entire decision letter carefully. ' Gain insights into why reviewer changes occur and decode updates throughout the submission After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. It passed the initial evaluation 10 days later. There are three basic types of decisions: Accept, Revise, and Reject. ’ So far, so good. wmivx dxary topva pickp oyvt znznlt obbxn hoiladgy xobqhbjn msyrsx