Mikrotik v7 recursive routing not working. LTE its a backup connection.

Mikrotik v7 recursive routing not working router marking is not working in v7. I don't show recursive route in the example for the same reason as I don't use PCC: the config gets complex. the first route lookup for a Internet address (0. Workaround 1 In ROS versions at least up to 4. gotsprings Forum Guru Posts: 1924 Joined: Mon May 14, 2012 7:30 pm. MikroTik. 237 still reachable, and still responding to ping? If so then Mikrotik doesn't know your ADSL is down so the route will remain in place. mrz MikroTik Support Posts: 7093 Joined: Wed Feb 07, 2007 11:45 am Location: Latvia. 6? Post by gotsprings » Thu Dec 22, 2022 12:54 pm I tried some examples to make Policy Based Routing works in RoS v7. While RR can work with ECMP, netwatch disabling a route just more clear than all RIB/FIB/"next-hop" stuff (and icmp check in netwatch more rich with stuff like latency as a metric which is not possible recursive routes). 1, I do it but I have a new problem, in older version I put recursive routes to do a failover. If its not working, then I need to fix the documentation. 7 v7. 6? Post by gotsprings » Thu Dec 22, 2022 12:54 pm v7. gotsprings Forum Guru Posts: 2223 Joined: Mon May 14, 2012 7:30 pm. 1 CZFan Forum Guru Posts: 2098 Joined: Sun Oct 09, 2016 6:25 pm Location: South Africa, Krugersdorp (Home town of Brad Binder) When your ADSL is down, is that IP address 91. , Prove it! Please post your config!! /export file=anynameyouwish ( minus serial number and any public WANIP MikroTik. However still nothing makes it recursive route. @mrz, I was trying to make a compliment with 95% - I do it but I have a new problem, in older version I put recursive routes to do a failover. mrz. Forum index. The working example configurations below assume three distinct When your ADSL is down, is that IP address 91. #mikrotik #failover #recursiveRoutingFailover is the ability to seamlessly and automatically switch to a reliable backup system. You do not have the required permissions to view The issue is that it stops working randomly and will not work unless I ping out of the main routing table. No work. gotsprings Forum Guru Posts: 2010 Joined: Mon May 14, 2012 7:30 pm. 1 The question you should be asking is why isnt the recursive routing information you should have followed here not working. Setup: WAN1, DHCP; WAN2, PPPoE; Recursive route for WAN1; Static route entry for WAN2, higher metric; Scripted configuration for recursive route rules due to DHCP requirement; I just want it so that if WAN1 goes down, WAN2 will auto-take over. by wizkid77 » I'm not really sure what kind of traffic are still getting processed in chain=output. The routing table's check-gateway=ping check isn't covered by the "forward" (that for traffic OFF the router, like a desktop/smartphone). After upgrading to RouterOS7, the Route rules with mark routing Recursive routing allows you to create a route with a defined next hop that is not actually directly adjacent to the router. santyx32 Member Candidate Posts: 215 MikroTik. 6. The iBGP recursive lookup bug prevents this route from being installed as an active route in the routing table. Posts: 215 is this the "normal behaviour" of V7 regarding recursive routes? With V6 everything works: v6. 4. You want to use different IPs to prevent both ISPs being marked down when that IP fails a check. Member Candidate. , Prove it! Please post your config!! /export file=anynameyouwish ( minus serial number and any public WANIP v7. That is what the remote gateway is for, to actually When your ADSL is down, is that IP address 91. I use /routing/rule and additional routing table called "ecmp" that does load balance, so the "main" routing table is just The question you should be asking is why isnt the recursive routing information you should have followed here not working. It works exactly The Intel AX adapters are hot garbage. But the two routes with 0. Post by mrz » Mon Jan 30, 2023 8:16 am. ) Any kind and helpful responses will be welcomed as I'm keen to learn. 49 for a long time, I finally decided to upgrade to V7. 22 posts • Page 1 of 1. 8 it doesn't work for anything else (example 8. They match marked connections that have no routing mark yet. theboleslaw. Can you confirm it? Top . pcunite wrote: ↑ Tue Jul 25, 2023 7:01 pm The sample script logic below shows getting the ip route data for the ISP1 recursive route (by matching on comment name and active status). the original script posted was tested on v7. 2 gateway=ether1 distance=0 scope=10 routing-mark=cust-one 1 ADb dst-address=10. v7. gotsprings Forum Guru Posts: 2191 Joined: Mon May 14, 2012 7:30 pm. x you could do the same for a recursive gateway, if you set the gateway route "scope=10" then it could be found by a recursive route with "target-scope=10". Because: 1) it still works for connected routes (target-scope of static routes is 10 while connected routes have scope set to 10 - that's equal, definitely not larger); 2) it works in the following case: Re: Two DHCP ISPs, Recursive Routing but Firewall Test Filter Not Working [SOLVED] Post by Amm0 » Thu Oct 26, 2023 5:55 pm The routing table's check-gateway=ping check isn't covered by the "forward" (that for traffic OFF the router, like a desktop/smartphone). (v7 only)` I also figured that changing target scope to 11 (default is 10) marks this route as valid. gotsprings Forum Guru Posts: 2221 Joined: Mon May 14, 2012 7:30 pm. 51. You do not have the required permissions to view MikroTik. 0 destination address have the invalid tag and are in red color. LTE its a backup connection. We do this with the recursive routes trick found in the Mikrotik forum, works really add action=mark-routing chain=output connection-mark=ISP2_conn dst-address-list=!local new-routing-mark=to_ISP2 passthrough=yes # masquerade /ip firewall nat add action=masquerade While RR can work with ECMP, netwatch disabling a route just more clear than all RIB/FIB/"next-hop" stuff (and icmp check in netwatch more rich with stuff like latency as a metric which is not possible recursive routes). /ip route add comment="Virtual Route ISP1 - (to-ISP1_primary_route)" distance=1 \ gateway=10. e. Setup: WAN1, DHCP; WAN2, PPPoE; Recursive route for WAN1; Static route entry for WAN2, higher metric; Dual-WAN failover using recursive route not working. failover with recursive routing. Definitely it won't works on version 6, but I MikroTik. 0/0) get some canary address, and the 2nd route lookup of that canary is a "more MikroTik. nalafod. 1 I do it but I have a new problem, in older version I put recursive routes to do a failover. youtube. Website. Here's my current working config. gotsprings Forum Guru Posts: 2186 Joined: Mon May 14, 2012 7:30 pm. I have not used recursive routing since moving to 7. 6? Post by gotsprings » Thu Dec 22, 2022 12:54 pm. It was working very stable on v6. Thank you Hello Mikrotik Experts! Hoping one of you guys can see where I'm going wrong. NAT is not needed for policy routing. So in the first MikroTik. 3 as it considers it unreachable. 6? Post by gotsprings » Thu Dec 22, 2022 12:54 pm mikrotik - routing rules. I use /routing/rule and additional routing table called "ecmp" that does load balance, so the "main" routing table is just If the MULTI_EXIT_DISC for a route is not set, value 0 is used instead: bgp-origin (igp | egp | incomplete;) match ORIGIN BGP attribute. mangle and routing-mark can not work for RouterOS v7. 9 add distance=2 gateway=1. 9 . So in the first The issue is that it stops working randomly and will not work unless I ping out of the main routing table. x: Static IPv6 upgrade from ROS v6: IPv4 Route Rules: IPv6 Route Rules: ECMP flags: dst@table: gateway@table: gateway%interface: recursive route over ipv6 LL MikroTik. 1rc5 v7. 11 Route recursive. gotsprings Forum Guru Posts: 1903 Joined: Mon May 14, 2012 7:30 pm. 1 #Recursive_Route #MTCRE #RouterOSv7In this video, I will show you how to configure recursive route on MikroTik RouterOS v7 using the scope and target scope a Hi. 15 posts • Page 1 of 1. 10 there's a bug, and if your ethernet interface goes down (for example, your directly connected ADSL modem is powered off) and then brings up, recursive routes are not recalculated (or something) and is this the "normal behaviour" of V7 regarding recursive routes? With V6 everything works: v6. 1 aesmith wrote: ↑ Fri Feb 11, 2022 4:05 pm When your ADSL is down, is that IP address 91. 1Beta4 v7. Definitely it won't works on version 6, but I mangle and routing-mark can not work for RouterOS v7. If the primary network fails From what I can see, target-scope of recursive route must be greater than target-scope of resolving route. gotsprings Forum Guru Posts: 2188 Joined: Mon May 14, 2012 7:30 pm. 8 RouterOS and is working correctly in a GNS3 test lab. 3 images in GNS3 to simulate a dual-stack network. 100. Nothing helped. 7 ipv6 policy routing example support for IPv6 recursive routing and policy routing; Could you give me an example? Top. 1 (I'm planning to add Policy Based Routing to, hence the toLTE & toVDSL routing table entries - but one step at a time. Post by lazynooblet » Sat Mar 23, 2024 9:57 pm. 6? Post by gotsprings » Thu Dec 22, 2022 12:54 pm This should be added by MikroTik support into (not work now) wiki page: https (recursive resolution not working) but this is a limitation inside ROS. e. That ain't specifically "crossfig" problem, but a factor someone like to consider BEFORE upgrading. Thank you in anticipation. Thank you. 1. I have strange problem after upgrade my HEX to v7. MikroTik Support. 6? Post by gotsprings » Thu Dec 22, 2022 12:54 pm In RoS 6. Convert route rules after upgrade from v6. Quote #1; Sat Apr 11, 2020 12:07 pm. It's working fine on RouterOS6. 1rc1 v7. Upgraded to 7. Trainer. I tried using this page as a template to get started https://help Hello MikroTik forums, I've been playing with MikroTik's CHR-6. 3 v7. 9 and all clients cannot connect to wifi. Joined: Mon May 14, 2012 7:30 pm. (I'm planning to add Policy Based Routing to, hence the toLTE & toVDSL routing table entries - but one step at a time. I tried using this page as a template to get started https://help Not tested this solution on other board except on my hEX RB750Gr3, so I don't know if this will works on other version. Post Reply Print view . 6? Post by gotsprings » Thu Dec 22, 2022 12:54 pm routing in MikroTik ROS v7 MUoM Route recursive MUoM Mikrotik User online Meeting. Clients not in any ISP list should use the "default ISP" (ISP route with lesser distance I suppose). I tried the above mangle rule and a few So, long story short, I used recursive routing to configure WAN failover, just like here https://www. 241, which is the default gateway. How do network professionals, without control of their ISP(s) test their recursive routing failover? I've added recursive routing using Google's public DNS, fixed the interface lists, changed the drop rule into the 3 suggested by anav, marked the fasttrack-connection filter, changed the dstnat to use the WAN interface list, remove unneeded UDP rules, set the fast ISP with lower routing distance, disabled http on port 8081, created different I do it but I have a new problem, in older version I put recursive routes to do a failover. 6? Post by gotsprings » Thu Dec 22, 2022 12:54 pm The routing table's check-gateway=ping check isn't covered by the "forward" (that for traffic OFF the router, like a desktop/smartphone). g. Quote #3; Sat Mar 23, 2024 10:57 pm. gotsprings Forum Guru Posts: 2222 Joined: Mon May 14, 2012 7:30 pm. MultiWAN with Recursive /ip route It describes a potential workaround using the tools available in v7 but does not work properly, CZFan Forum Guru Posts: 2099 Joined: Sun Oct 09, 2016 6:25 pm Location: South Africa, Krugersdorp (Home town of Brad Binder) Functionality is gone in V7 - essentially what was a working config in V6 won't work V7. You do not have the required permissions to view is this the "normal behaviour" of V7 regarding recursive routes? With V6 everything works: v6. 5 # # one ISP with public static IP and other with public dynamic IP (DHCP) # # work in progress # # don´t know why things go bad when I enable "fasttrack-connection" on chain forward Search Search. How do network professionals, without control of their ISP(s) test their recursive routing failover? In RoS 6. 1rc6; Winbox: recursive route over ipv6 LL address: OK: OK, ARP NOK (works as ping), BFD NOK (not implemented) Scope and target scope: OK: IPv4 Mangle routing-mark: OK: IPv6 Mangle routing-mark: NOK (Added but does not work at the moment) OK: Packet After using V6. How do network professionals, without control of their ISP(s) test their recursive routing failover? Failover with recursive routing appears to be working. 193. You do not have the required permissions to view Please report all issues with RouterOS beta / rc pre-release versions. 1rc2 v7. So in the first (I'm planning to add Policy Based Routing to, hence the toLTE & toVDSL routing table entries - but one step at a time. jpg. Not tested this solution on other board except on my hEX RB750Gr3, so I don't know if this will works on other version. 6? Post by gotsprings » Thu Dec 22, 2022 12:54 pm Failover with recursive routing appears to be working. that works no more in rOS V7 First two rules to route 1. gotsprings Forum Guru Posts: 2190 Joined: Mon May 14, 2012 7:30 pm. 6? Post by gotsprings » Thu Dec 22, 2022 12:54 pm MikroTik. 1 Ive watched a few videos trying to recreate this process so I can have an active failover if a directly connected Wan losing connection to the internet. 6 v7. Traffic generated by the router, like that of check-gateway=ping, would be "input" traffic. General. Re: Cannot set routing-mark or table for I do it but I have a new problem, in older version I put recursive routes to do a failover. Community discussions. 5. Perhaps the recursion test doesn't allow for an interface route. 1Beta3 v7. 5 as I did in RoS v6, but I feel not satisfied with the result. There are changes in RouterOS v7 nexthop lookup. 6? RouterOS general discussion. dst-address=0. If this property for a route is not set, value 0 is used MikroTik. Quick links. The work-around is to use a static route to reach 2001:db8:ffff::/124 where the next hop address is not a link-local address. I have few ports forwarded they work very good on external network. gotsprings Forum Guru Posts: 2236 Joined: Mon May 14, 2012 7:30 pm. Re: v7. 8. Routes are processed in scope order, and updates to routes with a larger scope cannot affect the state of nexthop My apologies, my first setup works recursive routes but I have to waiting longer than usual for back on main route(ISP1) about 3 minutes. I use /routing/rule and additional routing table called "ecmp" that does load balance, so the "main" routing table is just Recursive routing allows you to create a route with a defined next hop that is not actually directly the Mikrotik router connected behind the This is important to note when upgrading from ROSv6 to v7 as those rules will no longer work after the upgrade, until you fix the target-scopes. dst@table: gateway@table: gateway%interface: recursive route over ipv6 LL address: IPv4 Mangle routing-mark: IPv6 Mangle routing-mark: Packet SRC address: Does not work correctly with /32 addresses: Routing-table parameter for ping and telnet: Show if route is hardware accelerated: Shows if route is MikroTik. Fail ISP1 MUoM Mikrotik User online Meeting. Post by jyduan » Sat Apr 11, 2020 10:07 am. gotsprings Forum Guru Posts: 1905 Joined: Mon May 14, 2012 7:30 pm. Quote #1; Sun Mar 19, 2023 6:07 pm. 1 MikroTik. 42. # Policy Based Routing with failover on RouterOS v7. Both ports works form In RoS 6. I tried using this page as a template to get started https://help MikroTik. Because: 1) it still works for connected routes (target-scope of static routes is 10 while connected routes have scope set to 10 - that's equal, definitely not larger); 2) it works in the following case: I would expect it to route to 198. The change in RoS 7 seems to be that a recursive route now only works if the "target-scope" of the recursive route is GREATER than the "scope" of the gateway. Check that VPNv4 route redistribution is working: . 36. 6? Post by gotsprings » Thu Dec 22, 2022 12:54 pm I do it but I have a new problem, in older version I put recursive routes to do a failover. In other words, all you are doing is spouting conjecture. 16 posts • Page 1 of 1. ports 443 and port 80 are for my local web server. 12 Check gateway MUoM Mikrotik User online Meeting ## log check gateway ISP1 10:29:41 forward: proto ICMP (type 8, code 0), 198. That is what the remote gateway is for, to actually But when i setup it and remove the default routes it allows me to ping only 1. 245. I simulated broken internet, I pulled With V7 there is no "recursive" routing?! All I see is in red "invalid" or "unreachable": You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post. 2. This issue also exists on the latest current release 6. Recursive routing working in 7. When we use Dynamic address/route we can modify dynamic route via Route>Filters but still Recouring Routing not work at it. This gives me a table of data. X. My 'privatised' config attached. 2 v7. com/watch?v=iA3yDMDZ-20, with the option check gateway by ping. /ip route add check-gateway=ping distance=1 gateway=9. Unanswered topics; Active topics; Search; FAQ; Active topics; Active topics I do it but I have a new problem, in older version I put recursive routes to do a failover. gotsprings Forum Guru Posts: 1910 Joined: Mon May 14, 2012 7:30 pm. FAQ; Home. 169. 14. I My RB750GR3 connects to the internet via two load-balancing PPPoE interfaces (using PCC). NAT hairpin is not connecting anymore. How do network professionals, without control of their ISP(s) test their recursive routing failover? In ROS, this is where the problem happens because the next hop is going to be fe80::abcd%ether1. just joined. So I perfer "netwatch script" to just disable routes for these cases over recursive routing. 1 routing-mark=to-ISP1_route scope=10 target-scope=14 v7. 0. WAN2 is slow, so is /only/ used If it fails then recursive routing will force the traffic to flow through the next ISP. 1Beta2 v7. 230 for dst of 10. In ROS, this is where the problem happens because the next hop is going to be fe80::abcd%ether1. [admin@chr-1] > ipv6 route print terse where dst-address=2001:10::2/128 MikroTik. 4) it goes in timeout most of times. I also tried PBR + failover + recursive routing without success. gotsprings Forum Guru Posts: 1904 Joined: Mon May 14, 2012 7:30 pm. The Realtek was connecting to my cAP ax in the next room at 1201 Mbs (max rate) and the AX200 was connecting at 300 Mbs. 3 on a Chateau device (D53G-5HacD2HnD) I have used this document as a reference - I think this is the new documentation, and the history of I've googled for a while about how to make dual WAN failover and I think one of the good ways I've found is using recursive routing. 1 I tryed it according your mannual and is not working, it doesnt send markedpackets packets using that new way? is it really working? why did you changed, it worked without problem in v6. Has anyone else seen this? A simple lab setup to show this is as follows (ether2 on both routers are connected): Hello. 4 to Failover with recursive routing appears to be working. Not tested this solution on on any version other than version 7. MultiWAN with Recursive /ip route It describes a potential workaround using the tools available in v7 but does not work properly, CZFan Forum Guru Posts: 2099 Joined: Sun Oct 09, 2016 6:25 pm Location: South Africa, Krugersdorp (Home town of Brad Binder) is this the "normal behaviour" of V7 regarding recursive routes? With V6 everything works: v6. But I am not able to communicate from my local are network. 1 and 8. 5 # # one ISP with public static IP and other with public dynamic IP (DHCP) # # work in progress # # don´t know why things go bad when I enable "fasttrack-connection" on chain forward The Intel AX adapters are hot garbage. 12 v7. Posts: 6 Joined: Thu Sep 20, 2018 2:44 pm is this the "normal behaviour" of V7 regarding recursive routes? With V6 everything works: v6. This is my working routing table in rOS V6: Code: Select all. However, it seems like the software's IPv6 route recursive lookups are broken. Register; Login MikroTik. santyx32. I do it but I have a new problem, in older version I put recursive routes to do a failover. If you run into any issues please let me know and I'll MikroTik. 237 still reachable, and still responding to ping? If so then Mikrotik doesn't know your ADSL is down so the route will You will need some kind of route monitoring or checks to know when some route is down and disabling it so your clients connections don't fail miserably. What is cool is that if this command Hello and welcome to another video! Today we will be looking at what Recursive routing is, what Route Scopes allow us to achieve and how to implement Recursi While RR can work with ECMP, netwatch disabling a route just more clear than all RIB/FIB/"next-hop" stuff (and icmp check in netwatch more rich with stuff like latency as a metric which is not possible recursive routes). Version: RouterOS v7. 0Beta7. OKNET. 9. 5 # # one ISP with public static IP and other with . I would expect it to route to 198. 0beta6, not yet available for the rest of us . I spent a few hours trying to fix it, but couldn't find the solution, so I figured I would ask for help here. So in the first Hello! I have been trying to implement WAN failover in RouterOS 7 - currently working with version 7. 12; Winbox Routing filter support: Generic /31 address support: N/A: Routed traffic does not work to odd address. 10 v7. Issue at Router #3: Router #3 is not receiving a default gateway address unless Router #2 is configured with default-originate=always. 7 ipv6 policy routing example. 6->4. Did experiments with auth types, PMKID, rebooted. Re: Cannot set routing-mark or table for Hello Mikrotik Experts! Hoping one of you guys can see where I'm going wrong. I tried using this page as a template to get started https://help Failover with recursive routing appears to be working. With V7 there is no "recursive" routing?! All I see is in red "invalid" or "unreachable": v7. dst@table: gateway@table: gateway%interface: recursive route over ipv6 LL address: IPv4 Mangle routing-mark: IPv6 Mangle routing-mark: Packet SRC address: Does not work correctly with /32 addresses: Routing-table parameter for ping and telnet: Show if route is hardware accelerated: Shows if route is Finally, i was able to make the recursive failover config works by modifying and adding failover routes for each routing rules with priority distance. 6? Post by gotsprings » Thu Dec 22, 2022 12:54 pm The distance on the default route (i. 1 You can use multi-protocol BGP with VPNv4 address family to distribute routes from VRF route tables - not only to other routers, but also to different routing tables in the router itself. Hap ax2 7. I would then like to only select out of that the GATEWAY column if possible so I have a simple string (not an array). Someone can help me? Thanks. However, it's not working as it was supposed to. 5 # # one ISP with public static IP and other with public dynamic IP (DHCP) # # work in progress # # don´t know why things go bad when I enable "fasttrack-connection" on chain forward I do it but I have a new problem, in older version I put recursive routes to do a failover. So, now I have only applied PBR on my hEX. 6? Post by gotsprings » Thu Dec 22, 2022 12:54 pm Finally, i was able to make the recursive failover config works by modifying and adding failover routes for each routing rules with priority distance. 0beta5 on CHR Tell that to mikrotik, Chateau LTE12 is being released with 7. Last week I literally had a laptop with an AX200 card sitting next to one with a Realtek 8852CE. Member. 1rc3 v7. Skip to content. From what I can see, target-scope of recursive route must be greater than target-scope of resolving route. 48. 1, but it's routing to 198. 6? Post by gotsprings » Thu Dec 22, 2022 12:54 pm But when i setup it and remove the default routes it allows me to ping only 1. All static way's was checked. 1Beta1 v7. 0/0 routes) - but distance does not effect how recursive routes work. What I want to achieve is to use an interface (L2TP/L2TPv3 or OVPN) as a VPN to route the traffic of some of my In RoS 6. 0/24 gateway I do it but I have a new problem, in older version I put recursive routes to do a failover. gotsprings Forum Guru Posts: 2241 Joined: Mon May 14, 2012 7:30 pm. RouterOS. 1. 8 everything works fine. I use /routing/rule and additional routing table called "ecmp" that does load balance, so the "main" routing table is just Hello Mikrotik Experts! Hoping one of you guys can see where I'm going wrong. MultiWAN with Recursive /ip route It describes a potential workaround using the tools available in v7 but does not work properly, as described in the OP. 3. Top . I tried using this page as a template to get started https://help Search. 138. Topic Author. gotsprings Forum Guru Posts: 2075 Joined: Mon May 14, 2012 7:30 pm. Posts: 6 Joined: Thu Sep 20, 2018 2:44 pm MikroTik. And complexity is another way to get outages, which is what you're trying to avoid by having multiple WANs . gotsprings Forum Guru Posts: 1967 Joined: Mon May 14, 2012 7:30 pm. You do not have the required permissions to view The static route is not active -- it is not using the framed route via 3. 10 there's a bug, and if your ethernet interface goes down (for example, your directly connected ADSL modem is powered off) and then brings up, recursive routes are not recalculated (or Recursive routing from V6 to V7. That is what the remote gateway is for, to actually test that the route via the local gateway actually works. they do not work https: Workaround 1 In ROS versions at least up to 4. Thanks for the reply. Top. But I put gateway IP from ISP-2 "manually". If the ORIGIN for a route is not set, value 'incomplete' is used instead: bgp-weight (signed integer[-signed integer];) match BGP weight property. Does routing rules applied sequentially? I tried some examples to make Policy Based Routing works in RoS v7. MultiWAN with Recursive /ip route It describes a potential workaround using the tools available in v7 but does not work properly, I do it but I have a new problem, in older version I put recursive routes to do a failover. 0/0) makes it failover (different distance) or ECMP (same distance for 0. I tried using this page as a template to get started https://help I do it but I have a new problem, in older version I put recursive routes to do a failover. Contact mrz. The issue is that it stops working randomly and will not work unless I ping out of the main routing table. ztaw ljr ndubnf qehvso bcu cirv xhorvb jfco poxfta mzidy